Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quinn O’Connor results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 280 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,783 of 28,364 speakers). This Quinn O’Connor is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Quinn O’Connor
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos