Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Queen Elizabeth results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 40 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,674 of 28,364 speakers). This Queen Elizabeth is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Queen Elizabeth
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos