Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pussycat Dolls results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 297 faulty-reasoning hits from 168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,170 of 28,364 speakers). This Pussycat Dolls is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Pussycat Dolls
Speaker details
Total words: 168
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
14.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos168 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.6%22.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos