Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pullen results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Nature, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 131 faulty-reasoning hits from 168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,743 of 28,364 speakers). This Pullen is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Pullen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 168
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.7% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos168 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 9.5%9.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos