Speaker summary
⁠33%3 analyzed articles/videos134.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Promise David results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 127 faulty-reasoning hits from 134.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,892 of 28,364 speakers). This Promise David is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Promise David
Speaker details
Total words: 134.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
13.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos134.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 34.8%34.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 34.8%34.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos