Speaker summary
⁠60%2 analyzed articles/videos47.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Progressive Change Campaign Committee results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 47.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,738 of 28,364 speakers). This Progressive Change Campaign Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Progressive Change Campaign Committee
Speaker details
Total words: 47.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.6% percentile
33.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos47.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.6%20.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Begging the Question: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 2.0%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos