Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These pro-Palestine advocates results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and In-Group Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 93 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,470 of 28,364 speakers). This pro-Palestine advocates is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
pro-Palestine advocates
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510087.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos