Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Priya Banerjee results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 76.2% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 152.024 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 55.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,171 of 26,413 speakers). This Priya Banerjee is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Priya Banerjee
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
55.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 76.2%76.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 69.0%69.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 61.9%61.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.8%23.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 76.2%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 61.9%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 6.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos