Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Priscilla Ocen results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 342 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,797 of 28,364 speakers). This Priscilla Ocen is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Priscilla Ocen
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
70.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Composition/Division: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos