Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video49 analyzed words
BS Summary: These PragerU results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 154.929 faulty-reasoning hits from 49 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,449 of 28,364 speakers). This PragerU is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
PragerU
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 49
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
56.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos49 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 84.2%84.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.7%31.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 84.2%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos