Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Placer AI results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,402 of 28,364 speakers). This Placer AI is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Placer AI
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510088.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos