Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pivot to AI results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 162 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,397 of 28,364 speakers). This Pivot to AI is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Pivot to AI
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510088.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos