Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pierluigi Collina results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Recency Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 56.8% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (7,997 of 28,364 speakers). This Pierluigi Collina is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Pierluigi Collina
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
52.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 56.8%56.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 56.8%56.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 43.2%43.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 56.8%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 56.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos