Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Picus Swarm results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Special Pleading, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,389 of 28,364 speakers). This Picus Swarm is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Picus Swarm
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510088.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos