Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video191.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philip Chidel results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Recency Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 51.3% saturation with 114.605 hits. Analysis detected 398.427 faulty-reasoning hits from 191.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,202 of 28,364 speakers). This Philip Chidel is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Philip Chidel
Speaker details
Total words: 191.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
9.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos191.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 51.3%51.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 51.3%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos