Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Wahba results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 78.9% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 286 faulty-reasoning hits from 123 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,166 of 28,364 speakers). This Phil Wahba is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Phil Wahba
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 123
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
38.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos123 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 78.9%78.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 53.7%53.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.1%21.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Speaker 78.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 53.7%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos