Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Rood results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 67.6% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 437.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,745 of 28,364 speakers). This Peter Rood is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Peter Rood
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
40.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 67.6%67.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 46.3%46.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 67.6%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 46.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos