Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Meijer results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 341.333 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 80.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,146 of 28,364 speakers). This Peter Meijer is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Peter Meijer
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.9% percentile
80.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 83.3%83.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 83.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos