Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video467 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Fischer results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 931.487 faulty-reasoning hits from 467 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,273 of 28,364 speakers). This Peter Fischer is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Peter Fischer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠11%Peter Fischer (selected)10%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 467
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.9% percentile
9.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos467 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.4%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos