Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Faricy results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Unattributed Quote, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 69% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 142 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,509 of 28,364 speakers). This Peter Faricy is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Peter Faricy
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
33.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 69.0%69.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos