Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Haggith results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 54.7% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 68 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 37.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,640 of 28,364 speakers). This Pete Haggith is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Pete Haggith
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
37.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 56.3%56.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 54.7%54.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.8%18.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 56.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 54.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos