Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video798.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Perla Trevizo results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 928.143 faulty-reasoning hits from 798.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,391 of 28,364 speakers). This Perla Trevizo is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Perla Trevizo
Speaker details
Total words: 798.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751003.4% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos798.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Composition/Division: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos