Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pelosi results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 342 faulty-reasoning hits from 57 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,337 of 28,364 speakers). This Pelosi is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Pelosi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos57 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos