Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peggy Gallegher results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 50 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,287 of 28,364 speakers). This Peggy Gallegher is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Peggy Gallegher
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
75.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 51.5%51.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 51.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos