Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video80.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro Porro results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Circular Reasoning, and Confirmation Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 103 faulty-reasoning hits from 80.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,476 of 28,364 speakers). This Pedro Porro is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Pedro Porro
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 80.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.2% percentile
9.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos80.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos