Speaker summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video65.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro Mendoza results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 191.404 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,380 of 28,364 speakers). This Pedro Mendoza is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Pedro Mendoza
Speaker details
Total words: 65.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.7% percentile
19.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos65.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 20.9%20.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 5.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos