Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video48.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Composition/Division, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 82.5% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 211.806 faulty-reasoning hits from 48.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 61.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,906 of 28,364 speakers). This Pedro is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Pedro
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 48.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
61.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos48.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 82.5%82.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 70.6%70.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 70.6%70.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 41.3%41.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 41.3%41.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Bandwagon: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 70.6%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 70.6%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Speaker 41.3%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 41.3%, sitewide 7.5%BandwagonSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos