Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pavel Matveev results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 952.246 faulty-reasoning hits from 783 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,875 of 28,364 speakers). This Pavel Matveev is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Pavel Matveev
Speaker details
Total words: 783
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos783 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.1%10.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos