Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video166.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Wertheimer results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 83.625 hits. Analysis detected 322.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 166.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,134 of 28,364 speakers). This Paul Wertheimer is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Paul Wertheimer
Speaker details
Total words: 166.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.0% percentile
18.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos166.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos