Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video74.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Tumpowsky results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 224 faulty-reasoning hits from 74.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,275 of 28,364 speakers). This Paul Tumpowsky is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Paul Tumpowsky
Speaker details
Total words: 74.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.9% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos74.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos