Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video473.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Donovan results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 915.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 473.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (25,818 of 28,364 speakers). This Paul Donovan is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Paul Donovan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠9%Paul Donovan (selected)9%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 473.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
8.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos473.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.3%9.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos