Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Weah results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Recency Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 33% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 330.523 faulty-reasoning hits from 197 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (22,642 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrick Weah is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Patrick Weah
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 197
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510020.2% percentile
14.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos197 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos