Speaker summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos200.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Schiltz results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 357.057 faulty-reasoning hits from 200.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,766 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrick Schiltz is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Patrick Schiltz
Speaker details
Total words: 200.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
25.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos200.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.1%18.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos