Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video58.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Mahomes results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 73.9% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 182.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,408 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrick Mahomes is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Patrick Mahomes
Speaker details
Total words: 58.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.8% percentile
42.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 73.9%73.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 52.3%52.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 35.8%35.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 26.1%26.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 73.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 52.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos