Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video58.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patricio Palacios results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 23.625 hits. Analysis detected 111.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,930 of 28,364 speakers). This Patricio Palacios is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Patricio Palacios
Speaker details
Total words: 58.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
27.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 35.8%35.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.9%23.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 26.1%26.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos