Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video34.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pat Gray results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Framing Effect, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 69.6% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 47 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,911 of 28,364 speakers). This Pat Gray is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Pat Gray
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠58%Pat Gray (selected)40%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 34.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
39.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 69.6%69.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 34.8%34.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 69.6%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos