Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video19 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pasadena Police results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Negativity Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 76 faulty-reasoning hits from 19 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,366 of 29,145 speakers). This Pasadena Police is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Pasadena Police
Speaker details
Total words: 19
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510088.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos19 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos