Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paravicini results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 63 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,595 of 28,364 speakers). This Paravicini is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Paravicini
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos