Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pamela Hughes results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 231 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 80% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,169 of 28,364 speakers). This Pamela Hughes is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Pamela Hughes
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
80.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos