Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video42.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pam Ellis-Evenas results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 176 faulty-reasoning hits from 42.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,539 of 28,364 speakers). This Pam Ellis-Evenas is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Pam Ellis-Evenas
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠81%Pam Ellis-Evenas (selected)75%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 42.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos