Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pacific Legal Foundation results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Halo Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 24 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,255 of 28,364 speakers). This Pacific Legal Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Pacific Legal Foundation
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510088.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos