Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video54.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oxfam results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 119 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (14,428 of 26,730 speakers). This Oxfam is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Oxfam
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 54.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
29.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos54.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.7%31.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos