Speaker summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 66.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Owen Glieberman results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Quote-first Misdirection , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 58% saturation with 58 hits . Analysis detected 251.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (15,984 of 28,364 speakers). This Owen Glieberman is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. Owen Glieberman
Speaker details
Total words: 66.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.6% percentile 27.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos66.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 58.0% 58.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 37.5% 37.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 39.0% 39.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 24.0% 24.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 24.0% 24.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 18.0% 18.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 22.0% 22.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 24.0% 24.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Speaker 58.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst