Speaker summary
75%2 analyzed articles/videos63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Our Revolution results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Representativeness Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 52.2% saturation with 31.316 hits. Analysis detected 180.449 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (17,430 of 28,364 speakers). This Our Revolution is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Our Revolution
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
23.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos63 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 52.2%52.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.5%22.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.5%22.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Bandwagon: Speaker 52.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 0.0%BandwagonSitewide rateSpeaker rate