Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video37.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ORF Salzburg results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,484 of 26,828 speakers). This ORF Salzburg is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
ORF Salzburg
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 37.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos