Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orange County District Attorney results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,196 of 28,364 speakers). This Orange County District Attorney is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Orange County District Attorney
Speaker details
Total words: 16
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510088.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos16 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos