Speaker summary
90%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Opportunity Center for the Homeless results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 86 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 89% (3,192 of 28,364 speakers). This Opportunity Center for the Homeless is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Opportunity Center for the Homeless
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510088.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos