Speaker summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ookla results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anchoring Bias, and Recency Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 78.8% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 224 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,266 of 26,568 speakers). This Ookla is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Ookla
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
40.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 78.8%78.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 51.3%51.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.5%27.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 78.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 51.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos