Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Omer Ileri results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 75.375 hits. Analysis detected 320.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,144 of 28,364 speakers). This Omer Ileri is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Omer Ileri
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.9% percentile
14.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos200 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 33.5%33.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos