Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video129.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Omar Jamal results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 470 faulty-reasoning hits from 129.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,237 of 28,364 speakers). This Omar Jamal is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Omar Jamal
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠26%Omar Jamal (selected)17%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 129.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510025.1% percentile
16.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos129.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 31.7%31.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.8%28.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 8.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 0.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos